|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 97
|
OP
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 97 |
Picked up this Rohm dagger a couple of weeks ago did I do good or bad
9.jpg (40.63 KB, 509 downloads) 8.jpg (44.3 KB, 508 downloads) 7.jpg (42.92 KB, 508 downloads)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 97
|
|
OP
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 97 |
more pictures
6.jpg (56.01 KB, 505 downloads) 5.jpg (59.37 KB, 505 downloads) 4.jpg (56.83 KB, 504 downloads) 3.jpg (53.29 KB, 504 downloads) 2.jpg (53.29 KB, 502 downloads)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 97
|
|
OP
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 97 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 416
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 416 |
Hi Taff im no expert on these daggers especially pack full rohms but the thing that stands out to me is the blade has been cleaned up just after the maker mark for some reason which is not normally a good sign! regarding the rohm dedication it looks quite well struck but there are some really good fakes of this dagger out there so i have no idea if genuine or not this is jmo, im sure someone on here should be able to help you out a bit more.
Regards Adam
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,049
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,049 |
imo a doGgy EP&s dagger That has had the blade polished and the ROHM INSCRIPTION APPLIED LEAVING THE INCH OR SO WITH THE LOGO IN ORIGINAL CONDITION
Sorry sreames fake to me hope it was't expensive
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 97
|
|
OP
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 97 |
So what are we saying the dagger is ok but has has a bad inscription put on,need to know for when i take it back thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,049
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,049 |
Thats my take as per my previous post by doggy I meant original but poor condition What state is the obverse in ?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 97
|
|
OP
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 97 |
front
1.jpg (46.88 KB, 305 downloads)
Last edited by taff; 08/06/2010 03:25 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 97
|
|
OP
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 97 |
got this one also in the same deal
2.jpg (43.57 KB, 304 downloads) 3.jpg (39.95 KB, 299 downloads) 4.jpg (47.74 KB, 296 downloads) 5.jpg (36.38 KB, 300 downloads)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,610 Likes: 8
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,610 Likes: 8 |
hi taff any chance on a close up of the no. on the crossgaurd of that last dagger please
Regards Sean
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,049
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,049 |
Second thoughts perhaps its been stored part ways out of the scabbard is the pitting to the same point on both sides of the blade?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 97
|
|
OP
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 97 |
number
1.jpg (47.79 KB, 233 downloads)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 97
|
|
OP
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 97 |
yes it is new pictures to show this
2.jpg (45.26 KB, 229 downloads) 3.jpg (55.49 KB, 226 downloads) 4.jpg (58.53 KB, 228 downloads)
Last edited by taff; 08/09/2010 02:27 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,610 Likes: 8
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,610 Likes: 8 |
Regards Sean
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 563 Likes: 3
|
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 563 Likes: 3 |
Hi all,
Pack & S�hne was 1 of 16 makers that made R�hms, so, the maker is valid. I wouldnt know about the inscription-part though? It looks OK, but, I never saw 1 in real life. Would looking up the number somewhere bring anything?
Sincerely,
Karin-Renate
Nichts ist Ende, nichts ist Anfang.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 97
|
|
OP
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 97 |
were these numbered daggers the property of one guy,ore were they the property of the unit and lent out for special events then given back at the end of the day
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,049
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,049 |
Do search there was a big thread on these numbers a while back
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,615 Likes: 1
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,615 Likes: 1 |
Rohm dagger has a fake dedication.
If you do a search on 'epack Rohm' compare the dedication, look closely at 'Ernst Rohm'.
-serge-
|
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,669
Posts329,117
Members7,524
| |
Most Online5,900
Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
|
