|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 570
|
OP
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 570 |
Hi is the opinions on this one.
ckl shell.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 570
|
|
OP
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 570 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 162
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 162 |
dosnt look bad, you can see its a re issue, my only concern is why the bottom of the shield has been removed, the shape is not fully reconisable, regards phil
PHIL BROWN
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,224
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,224 |
Any time one sees a critical area of an SS decal defaced, one should see the red flags going up. Be very careful.....
Magna res est vocis et silentii temperamentum.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,948
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,948 |
Wise words, Mike...my thoughts exactly.
Cheers,
Darryl
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 829
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 829 |
Kind of tough to say anything positive or negative about it with these photos alone. The decal doesn't appear to be a CKL, but its color doen't look champagne, either. Nor is it clear about what's under the decal. The remnant of an Army decal? If everything is right, this could be an Army helmet reisshed to the SS. BUT, you know how rare that is. right? Personally. I doubt it.
Shu
|
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,669
Posts329,113
Members7,524
| |
Most Online5,900
Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
9 members (Mikee, Dean Perdue, Luftbud, derjager, Eric26, ado, RookieSA, stingray, BretVanSant),
613
guests, and
75
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
