|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 915
|
OP
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 915 |
These are pretty rare daggers, and there appears to be a lot of decent copies on the market, which may be tough to detect if mated with a period Eickhorn Army blade, especially when looking only at pics. I have read a few conflicting methods of detecting copies, but the most reliable seems to be the crossguard width and pommel measurement. I have seen measurements claimed all the way from 81 to 87mm. I'm aware that the copies tend to have a smaller crossguard width due to the shrinkage involved in reproducing these. My question, has anyone else measured theirs (crossguard I mean ). Here's mine to kick off: Crossguard width: 83.7mm Pommel width: 25mm Type: Eickhorn with silvered steel scabbard. Hopefully there's a few out there on GD Red
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,129
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,129 |
Here is mine. Maker is Eickhorn. Crossguard width: 84 mm Regards
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 163
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 163 |
Hi, My "black" uncleaned Eickhorn example: Crossguard: 83.6mm Pommel: 25mm
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 163
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 163 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 163
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 163 |
Complete shot just to see the colour of the whole piece!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,814 Likes: 18
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,814 Likes: 18 |
Mine is magnetic scabbard, non-magnetic scabbard rings.
Crossguard is 83.6mm Grip is 26.4 mm Pommel is 24.8 mm
John
Always looking for Eickhorns and etched bayonets.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,049
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,049 |
Anybody else notice the difference in scabbard bands on Matrese and Maxwells daggers.Love that patina Maxwell
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 163
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 163 |
My scabbard is the type with the throat cut straight in the top of the scabbard. The scabbard is aluminium base with a silver plating over the aluminium.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,814 Likes: 18
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,814 Likes: 18 |
Mine has scabbard bands that look like Maxwell's.
The scabbard is magnetic and the throat is also magnetic.
John
Always looking for Eickhorns and etched bayonets.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,316
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,316 |
I have the original Eickhorn printing plate (for their catalogs) for the railway dagger as well as the extremely rare railway water protection dagger. Interestingly, the scabbard bands on Maxwell's dagger appear to be those depicted on the railway water protection dagger. The "smoother" curves of the scabbard rings on the first two daggers posted in this thread are those shown on the catalog picture as being the bands for the standard railway dagger. Since these two dagger types were so similar, perhaps parts were mixed. In either case there is definately a difference and it is shown in the catalog pics.
Silver Badge #0398 My Avatar = My dagger security system!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,316
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,316 |
Here we go... On the right we see the ultra rare railway water protection dagger. The scabbard bands on this dagger have noticeably more angular lines, are thinner, and are slightly wider (from left to right) than the fittings on the standard railway dagger (left). Because these daggers appear side by side in a period catalog picture, I would have to conclude that the differences between them (in their construction) are intentional. If the scabbard bands were supposed to be the same, they would be pictured as being the same in the catalog. Because they are different, I would have to believe that Eickhorn made two slightly different types of scabbard bands for these two daggers. I would suspect that due to their similarity, they were mixed-up in house and Maxwell's dagger was constructed with what were originally intended to be railway water protection scabbard bands (an easy mistake to make). Very interesting... Other opinions? Please see pics:
Silver Badge #0398 My Avatar = My dagger security system!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,316
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,316 |
Silver Badge #0398 My Avatar = My dagger security system!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,129
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,129 |
Close up of my scabbard...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,129
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,129 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,129
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,129 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,129
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,129 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,002 Likes: 29
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,002 Likes: 29 |
Concerning the scabbard bands of original RRPP daggers: The early EICKHORN with aluminium scabbard with the built-in-throat seems to have always the very bevelled variant. On all other kind of scabbards and manufacturers and assumable manufacturing periods I could observe total mixtures (naturally always in pairs) of heavily bevelled, slightly bevelled and straight scabbard bands also varying slightly also in thickness of the oval rings and their space between. The hard I tried, up to now I could not detect any rule for the use of them in regard of production time, kind of scabbard (steel/silvered, steel/aluminium coating, pure steel/brushed) or manufacturer. Just my personal ovservation on a lot of these (period) daggers. As the early RRPP daggers from EICKHORN all (?) have the very bevelled avriant I dare to doubt that these bands they were intended alone for the much more rare RRWWPP daggers (as in the image) but first way for the early RRPP dagger from EICKHORN as said and always observed on them. The RRPP dagger with the straight looking scabbard bands (of the image) seems to be one of the already next generation. Regards,
wotan, gd.c-b#105
"Never look for sqare eggs" as a late owner of an original FHH-dagger used to say.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 915
|
OP
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 915 |
Thanks for the measurements and observations... It's interesting to see that there is no casting flaw in the Eickhorn catalogue image, I wonder if it was a retouched image or photographed from a prototype or enhanced by a chiseleur.
So far the crossguard widths are consistent amongst our small sample of around 84mm, I wonder where 87mm came from as appears in the narrative in germandressdaggers.com? I would be very interested to know if anyone has a crossguard with that kind of dimension.
Mine also has the shallow bevelled type scabbard bands. Its interesting to see so many variations in a dagger that is so uncommon.
Red
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 915
|
OP
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 915 |
This is a pretty good copy reviewed by a fellow member in the Repro Forum. The crossguard measure on this one is 82.6mm, not far off an original.
This illustrates how easy it would be to get duped with one of these on eBay. Luckily this was clearly advertsied as being a repro.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,002 Likes: 29
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,002 Likes: 29 |
As a little addition the scabbard bands of my three RRPP daggers. First the earliest EICKHORN with built in scabbard mouth.
wotan, gd.c-b#105
"Never look for sqare eggs" as a late owner of an original FHH-dagger used to say.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,002 Likes: 29
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,002 Likes: 29 |
EICKHORN mid period but still heavily silvered.
wotan, gd.c-b#105
"Never look for sqare eggs" as a late owner of an original FHH-dagger used to say.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,002 Likes: 29
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,002 Likes: 29 |
Very late HÖRSTER with aluminium coated scabbard (but I think I have seen the same scabbard bands with late period EIKHORNs too).
wotan, gd.c-b#105
"Never look for sqare eggs" as a late owner of an original FHH-dagger used to say.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,002 Likes: 29
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,002 Likes: 29 |
My three RRPP. From l to r: very early EICKHORN, mid period EICKHORN, very late period HÖRSTER (came with army portepee period attached out of the household of the former wearer). Crossguard measurements: Early EICKHORN: 83,6 mm. Mid period EICKHORN: 82,6 mm. Very late period HÖRSTER: 84,4 mm. Regards,
wotan, gd.c-b#105
"Never look for sqare eggs" as a late owner of an original FHH-dagger used to say.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,316
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,316 |
DAMN Wotan! Those three rail daggers hanging together is an IMPRESSIVE sight! Seems like for most collectors this is one of those dagger types that they buy just one example of. I honestly don't think I have ever seen three together. STUNNING! and Congrats! Johnny
Silver Badge #0398 My Avatar = My dagger security system!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 915
|
OP
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 915 |
Wotan, that is simply exceptional I was happy to have found one of these, but variants and makers... just beautiful!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 915
|
OP
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 915 |
Wotan,
I'd be interested in learning a little more about your Horster, they are very tough to find and I suspect few collectors have ever inspected one...
Could you post a detail pic of the crossguard, pommel sunwheel and the lower ornate scabbard fitting? The obvious question is did Horster buy their fittings from Eickhorn, or did they go it alone. Horster daggers are often easily identifiable as they frequently did additional hand enhancements to their fittings, a bit like the hand-work and engraving seen on their Land Customs daggers which stands out from other period manufacturers.
Red
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 915
|
OP
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 915 |
Thanks to everyone who measured up their daggers and posted or e-mailed me their findings, its greatly appreciated. For those who may be interested, below are the results from the small sample, but still a good indicator... Thanks Red
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,654
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,654 |
Notice that the 2 RR daggers in the Eickhorn book show the typical 2 piece pommel and NOT the standard Army type. IMO the "1st model" never existed as there is not proof, photos in ware etc. Even the scabbard bands are the same design. Much different than the Army dagger. IMO someone found a box of black grips and installed them on a bunch of Army daggers. Thus calling them RR daggers.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,002 Likes: 29
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,002 Likes: 29 |
@Redbaron: Sorry, there are currently some difficulties in my private aera that don´t give me enough time to act here as I would like to do. As soon as possible I will send you at least a mail concerning your case of interest. Regards,
wotan, gd.c-b#105
"Never look for sqare eggs" as a late owner of an original FHH-dagger used to say.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,615 Likes: 1
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,615 Likes: 1 |
Great triple set there wotan. Wow! I'm one who has never seen a Horster example and would look forward to seeing it. -serge-
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,917 Likes: 5
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,917 Likes: 5 |
One thing about the Horster is the TM on the blade. No other TR Dagger by Horster had this style TM with just the wording (no sword in wreath) just like their Police Bayonet blades of the 1930s, so no repros of this maker that I have ever seen. My Horster Rail came out of Terra Heute, IN from a motel buy with hangers and knot and in choice mint conditon. My Eickhorn with formed throat came from a motel buy in St. Louis directly from the US veteran with hangers and knot also. It shows some wear, but still like the silvered Eickhorn formed throat model and I have never seen a repro of this style either. BTW, the Horster had the oval buckle hangers and the Eickhorn has the square buckle rare type. Ron Weinand Weinand Militaria
MAX CHARTER MEMBER
LIFE MEMBER OVMS
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 915
|
OP
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 915 |
Ron, would LOVE to see some pics of these, or are they locked away with the rest of your horde I'm interested to learn more about the crossguards on the Horster, never seen one of these first-hand... Red
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,917 Likes: 5
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,917 Likes: 5 |
Sorry, their in the bank at the moment. May get them out over the summer time permitting, but am currently trying to photograph my engraved SAs for Tom Wittmann. Ron Weinand Weinand Militaria
MAX CHARTER MEMBER
LIFE MEMBER OVMS
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 4
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 4 |
quote: So far the crossguard widths are consistent amongst our small sample of around 84mm, I wonder where 87mm came from as appears in the narrative in germandressdaggers.com? I would be very interested to know if anyone has a crossguard with that kind of dimension.
I realize I'm a year late for this discussion but I recently rejoined GDC. 87mm might have come from Stephens Reproduction? Recognition! He states that the real one he used for comparison was 87.5mm (crosssguard) vs. the repro which was 84.4. When I bought my Bahnschutz from Bill Shea, these measurements caused me to worry a bit as my crossguard wasn't 87mm but rather around 84mm like many GDC members who posted to this thread. Chris
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,917 Likes: 5
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,917 Likes: 5 |
Not everything in Reproduction? Recognition! is correct. Since Fred is coming to the MAX and is going to be on the panel discussion at the Seminar Program, maybe this should be one of the questions discussed. Ron Weinand Seminar Coordinator The MAX Show
MAX CHARTER MEMBER
LIFE MEMBER OVMS
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,304
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,304 |
Chris,
Do you have any pictures of your Bahnschutz dagger ?
This hobby is always in evolution, theories that were known to be correct 15 years ago can sometimes be different today.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 4
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 4 |
Hi, here are a few I had kicking around.
Chris
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 4
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 4 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 4
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 4 |
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,652
Posts328,702
Members7,501
|
Most Online5,900 Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
8 members (Vern, Paul, benten, AntonGrabbe, Seppi, Dave, AndyRose, Documentalist),
415
guests, and
55
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|