|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 759
|
OP
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 759 |
Any opinions on this grip? Definately original but I have alays wondered about the shape it doesn't seem cemetric at the bottom crossguard. shows signs of being taken apart on top crossguard(arghhh).want to list for sale but would like opinions before doing so maybey someone has seen this type of "flaw" if you will before?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 759
|
|
OP
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 759 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 759
|
|
OP
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 759 |
Sorry trying to make clear.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,032
|
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,032 |
Hello, Reds! Is the reverse the same as the obverse? Is it an RZM dagger? Regards, teufel
Never fry bacon in the nude!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,430 Likes: 1
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,430 Likes: 1 |
If that's the only "flaw", I wouldn't worry about it.
"And I will show you where the Iron Crosses grow"
-Cross of Iron
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 759
|
|
OP
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 759 |
This is a nonmarked blade. I would say the reverse is the same. I've never doubted originality was curious if anyone ever noticed this on any other grips?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,032
|
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,032 |
Never fry bacon in the nude!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,077
|
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,077 |
I wouldn't be concerned about it. It's possible one side has been repaired and that is the reason for the mismatch. But, I don't see any evidence of repair. It appears to be an "Eickhorn" grip assembly and that maker was a little "loose" with their grip fits and finishing. Could the blade be a ground Rohm?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,049
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,049 |
I have two early SAs that look exactly the same
|
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,685
Posts329,254
Members7,536
| |
Most Online5,900
Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
|
