UBB.threads
Posted By: essox Factory defect.one venthole missing - 10/17/2005 07:34 AM
Here is ET66 (491) helmet strap marked 1940.
I have shown it before,but here are new photos.
I also see on another forum that they discuss a helmet with no ventholes as a 45modell?
Can that be a factory defect too?
My helmet looks like a sd SS,with paintings probably done by the resistance in norway.(Norwegian flag)are there other who have helmets with defects?please show them.
Does it also exist helmets with decals on the wrong side?
Show them up.
erik

Attached picture gd_001.jpg
Posted By: essox Re: Factory defect.one venthole missing - 10/17/2005 07:34 AM
2

Attached picture gd_002.jpg
Posted By: essox Re: Factory defect.one venthole missing - 10/17/2005 07:35 AM
3

Attached picture gd_003.jpg
Posted By: essox Re: Factory defect.one venthole missing - 10/17/2005 07:35 AM
4

Attached picture gd_006.jpg
Posted By: Andrew H Re: Factory defect.one venthole missing - 10/17/2005 08:45 AM
Well, that's real interesting! I'm surprised it would leave the factory that way.


Andrew
Posted By: Larry Marcella Re: Factory defect.one venthole missing - 10/17/2005 12:20 PM
That shell could have been a true reject and not assembled till after the war.
Larry
Posted By: erikofnorway Re: Factory defect.one venthole missing - 10/18/2005 01:33 PM
Larry, I saw the helmet while visiting Erik last week. This helmet is NOT post war assembled. It shows true honest wear, the liner, linerband, rivets and washers are all 101%. On top of it, the helmet shows soldier art often found on helmets liberated my Norwegian MILORG.

I found the helmet to be one of the most unique ones I have ever inspected and asked Erik to post it here.

By the way Erik, it was very nice to meet with you and also to inspect your fantastic collection.

Erik
Posted By: jotuntroll Re: Factory defect.one venthole missing - 10/18/2005 04:21 PM
Super rare detail Erik. Thanks!!!!! Wink
Posted By: RZM 499 Re: Factory defect.one venthole missing - 10/19/2005 12:13 AM
Mega rare Eek Eek
Posted By: darryl Re: Factory defect.one venthole missing - 10/19/2005 12:20 AM
I have never seen another one like it. Definitely a rare piece.

Cheers,
Posted By: essox Re: Factory defect.one venthole missing - 10/19/2005 07:48 AM
Thanks for replying guys.
This is my rarest helmet.
Are there others who have defect on helmets?
Please show them up.
And to Erik of norway,it was a pleasure have you visiting me,you are always welcome.(traded me a 35DD luftwaffe yeasterday,pics later today.
Erik
Posted By: KasserinePss Re: Factory defect.one venthole missing - 10/19/2005 04:23 PM
I can only congratulate Essox for finding such an out of the books period example, and knowledgeable Erikofnorway for giving us such a detailed local, historical, information on why such remarkable period variations shell and markings may surface in Norway. Many of us have learned something new.
Sometimes in these forums some helmets are given the quick “post war” kiss of death when at first they do not appear to conform with the known period classical details and characteristics explained in many books.
Posted By: Donald L Re: Factory defect.one venthole missing - 10/22/2005 12:54 AM
Hi Erik,
I have an M35 beaded LS helmet completely missing the left hand vent (never drilled), the right side is normal. I'll post images later,
Don
Posted By: RZM 499 Re: Factory defect.one venthole missing - 10/22/2005 01:13 AM
I have inspect the helmet today(blacklight).It has been a decal removed on the SS side.WOW. Smile
Posted By: essox Re: Factory defect.one venthole missing - 10/24/2005 02:51 PM
thanks,rzm.it looks like a SS decal.
i look forward to see the pictures from donald.
on page 324-325 in RADOVIC BOOK 1 a 42 model without vents is refered as a 42/45 Model.
erik
Posted By: tuborg Re: Factory defect.one venthole missing - 01/11/2006 01:49 AM
Been some talk of ventless helmets lately.

Thought I would bring up this.
Posted By: tuborg Re: Factory defect.one venthole missing - 01/11/2006 02:08 AM
a
Posted By: tuborg Re: Factory defect.one venthole missing - 01/11/2006 02:09 AM
.
© Your new forums