UBB.threads
Posted By: Krullies Hitler and women ... - 08/18/2010 04:12 PM
Hi all,

On a info-hunt looking for anything on a specific KdF-pin I found a bit of a weird page. Its kinda awkward to read, and, I didn't finish all of it, reckon not all is true, either, but, maybe it has a place somewhere. Im not out to put anything "unclean" anywhere! Its sort of interesting, and, if true, more then worrying, to see SO many suicide'ish stuff surrounding Hitler, even as early as the 1920s?

Enjoy,
Karin-Renate
Posted By: A J Re: Hitler and women ... - 08/18/2010 09:37 PM
Karin you have recently had a post edited for language and now this ranmbling ?????
Posted By: Krullies Re: Hitler and women ... - 08/18/2010 11:04 PM
A J,

Yes, I was, Im glad you ask, so you have a proper set of facts to form opinion. It was 1 word that did it. But, how is this rambling connected to that? Actually, nevermind, Im not sure what to think about what I read on that page, and somehow this undescision made me post it here? Weird facts can reveal interesting things sometimes if people talk about it, no?

Karin-Renate
Posted By: Adam Kirchen Re: Hitler and women ... - 08/19/2010 01:27 AM
Kind of curious what AJ is talking about? I don't see any rambling here. It is a post linking a page about Hitler and his crazy love life. If you don't mind me asking AJ, how is this rambling? Is it not Period history?? Secondly we all know how overboard Dave goes with editing has can be seen all too often. We have no idea what was said in that other post it is gone and unfortunately we aren't all native English speakers so things certainly don't always come out in the way the non-native speaker intended it to. I have not seen one objectionable post by Karin. On the contrary I have enjoyed most her post. They have a little more life to them than most here that's for certain. So why don't we get all the facts before we rush to judgement and maybe explain what you mean by rambling AJ? Because your post is the equal to mumbling or unexplained rant IMHO.
Posted By: Dean Perdue Re: Hitler and women ... - 08/19/2010 06:02 AM
Just wanted to say I enjoyed the link and learned a few new things by it.
IMO trying to figure out just what is fact or opinion has been tough on this subject, as some of the info out there seemed so far out that it sounded fabricated or over exaggerated.
Thought the book Hitler & Geli by Haymen was intresting and somewhat along these lines.
Posted By: Krullies Re: Hitler and women ... - 08/19/2010 12:52 PM
Hi Adam, A J, Dean,

I can only say, that Im shocked, and sorry, about what happened, especially in a topic I never never never EVER would play with. I gave ideas, about how to do some sort of memorials. And I feel it were good options? I ended, with saying, it should be a private thing too. And that maybe people should request, or be invited, to the topic of a specific memorial-topic, 'cause, some people dont shy from doing undesired things in sacred places. And my bad mistake was to call those people doing not funny things a certain term, in the heat of the moment ... or not thinking clearly, if you want. Anyway, Im so so very sorry this happened And I do sincerely apologize. For what its worth.

Karin-Renate
Posted By: derjager Re: Hitler and women ... - 08/20/2010 12:41 AM
I say "no harm, no foul". How could a bad word get past the site s auto. censor anyway? It should have looked like ********.

Many of us have probably typed a word or phrase that might better have been left undone. I have and will again I'm sure.

--dj--Joe

Attached picture candle.gif
Posted By: Dave Re: Hitler and women ... - 08/20/2010 01:43 AM
Members have found ways of getting around that by incorrectly spelling the word concerned or using a symbol to replace a letter.

And, yes those ******** things do happen. But when the person sees the ********** and goes back to alter the word and get by the software, then that is not a mistake
Posted By: Adam Kirchen Re: Hitler and women ... - 08/20/2010 09:42 PM
My only question to your reply Dave is it completely necessary to remove the entire comment and putting "edited for language"? Instead of the just the sentence or word that is objectionable. By doing the former mentioned way you make it appear that the entire comment is objectionable and not only the sentence or word in it. This can give people like AJ here the ammunition to assume that something horrible was posted in a very sensitive topic. Making all parties look bad and that just isn't right. If you are removing the entire comment why not delete the entire posting and all to prevent this assuming from happening. Hope I made my self understandable and thanks.

Adam
Posted By: Skynyrd Re: Hitler and women ... - 08/21/2010 12:48 AM
What exactly is the question ?
I don't think theres any question of Hitlers extreme magnetism on both men & woman ,,, And theres also no question that every facet of his life was pretty much a life of extremes that none of us could even remotely imagine.
Posted By: Dave Re: Hitler and women ... - 08/21/2010 01:00 AM
I take out the bit that is against the code of conduct and anything left that does not make sense on it's own.

Dave
Posted By: derjager Re: Hitler and women ... - 08/21/2010 06:23 PM
Originally Posted By: Dave Hohaus
I take out the bit that is against the code of conduct and anything left that does not make sense on it's own.

Dave


Does this action incur a warning or a suspension?

--dj--Joe
Posted By: A J Re: Hitler and women ... - 08/23/2010 12:33 PM
Hi Karen apologies if my comment above offended but from you reply I don't think it did Happy collecting
AJ
Posted By: Krullies Re: Hitler and women ... - 08/26/2010 01:10 AM
Originally Posted By: A J
Hi Karen apologies if my comment above offended but from you reply I don't think it did Happy collecting
AJ


Hi A J

Really, NO appologies necesary ... honestly, were good ... your opinion is as valid as anyones ... Besides, Im not mad THAT fast you know and even then I always get sad first. Anyway, thanx, and you have fun too!

Sincerely,
Karin-Renate
© Your new forums