dagger ss - 09/09/2013 02:33 PM
Say, the original dagger?
thank you
thank you
Re: dagger ss - 09/09/2013 02:38 PM
/////////
Re: dagger ss - 09/09/2013 02:53 PM
I m not expert but i see early nickel grip fitting ( crossguard also gau marked) who don t agree with late scabbard and rzm code blade...but i think you ll have to wait for the opinions of the real experts of this forum...my opinion is insignificant
Regards
Regards
Re: dagger ss - 09/09/2013 08:44 PM
A very odd configuration. 1938 is a little late for a "mixed parts" dagger. The grip appears to be restored. I would be leery of this one. At best, it appears to be a parts dagger.
Re: dagger ss - 09/10/2013 05:06 AM
Originally Posted By: ollar777
Say, the original dagger?
thank you
thank you
NO,
wrong motto pattern and too far down the blade. Also the TM, particularly the numbers of the contract code
Grip is a newer one
Regards,
Gerd
Re: dagger ss - 09/10/2013 07:08 AM
In my opinion the design team with the addition of copies!
thank you
thank you
Re: dagger ss - 09/10/2013 05:08 PM
Originally Posted By: ollar777
Say, the original dagger?
thank you
thank you
Answer on your question write on crossguard.
Re: dagger ss - 10/07/2013 03:41 PM
its for sure a parts dagger, it has a Gau marked SA daggers crossguard.
New grip,its a no good.
Runnnn
Ger
New grip,its a no good.
Runnnn
Ger
Re: dagger ss - 10/10/2013 05:53 PM
I dont like anything about this dagger , sorry .
Re: dagger ss - 10/19/2013 08:30 PM
Bad to the bone. Fake blade, fake runes, SA crossguard, handle not original SS type, repainted scabbard.