I don’t understand how it is possible to discuss the originality of the ring from such angles and bad photos, the appearance of the ring is not shown: there are many very important places there, including traces of manual processing.
There is no photo of the skull, it also has traces of manual refinement.
Bad photos (not informative) on engraving.
And still, there are people who say that the ring is good.
There are no normal photos, how can you say something definite from such photos?
Or someone does not understand the issue of these rings, or simply makes unconsidered statements ...
| 
