|
|
If a specific post was interesting or useful to you, we recommend that you Like that post. It tells the post author, and others, that you found the information valuable. Clicking Like is another way to let others know that you enjoy it without leaving a comment.
Log in to join the conversation and Like this content.
|
|
|
 Re: NSKK High Leader Debate Is Over
#11384
Oct 24th a 10:43 AM
|
| by Frederick J. Stephens |
| Frederick J. Stephens |
Opps, submitted too soon.
What I wanted to emphasize was that if these Huhnlein pieces had been known about for 50 years previously - as claimed by Ron - then why did they not appear in the earlier books? Certainly Atwood or Mollo would have known about them.
The fact that they do not show up until 1974 - about the same time as the accepted fakes first appear - does not inspire the belief that they were well known in the late 1950s.
It is all academic now, I think the case against the Huhnlein pieces has been satisfactorily demonstrated.
FJS
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,668
Posts329,048
Members7,518
| |
Most Online5,900
Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
10 members (Mikee, C. Wetzel-20609, Dean Perdue, Dave, Tanker, Skyline Drive, stingray, Eric26, atis, Luftbud),
660
guests, and
88
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
