Is there agreement that neither blade has a trademark? Or is it just the word Eickhorn stamped or etched into the blade without the squirrel?
As for the dagger, now the pieces are beginning to fit into place. I went back to page six and sure enough it was the �MAX� dagger. I don�t know why I didn�t quite make the connection. I wasn�t there, and don�t offhand remember all of the details, but it did generate some heavy duty bad feelings. Likewise for the 1st model dagger, offhand I can�t see why it would not have a trademark to advertise the company's capabilities. On some high quality Imperial era blades a trademark might be missing (not a lot but it does happen). But during the Third Reich? Something to ponder. FP
Pondering: Now if it has paw prints from a squirrel hmmmm...............
