#38581
05/10/2010 01:59 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,039 Likes: 4
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,039 Likes: 4 |
Could be marks from a vice. But there are no similar markings on the front and no apparent reason for a need to use a vice. But it's interesting that Sauer was also a small weapons manufacturer...
|
|
|
#38582
05/10/2010 02:12 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,049
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,049 |
Yes but on stock work the diamonds are left raised not indented as on this hilt I have similar marks on a colt pistol grip.Maybe other side had the benifit of a soft jaw who knows ?
as before it is still a great dagger from Suhl where they seemed to make a better product
|
|
|
#38583
05/10/2010 02:17 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,039 Likes: 4
|
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,039 Likes: 4 |
Sorry if I misled you. I didn't intend to suggest that the grip was intentionally checkered. What I am suggesting is that the marks were caused by pressure against a stock. But who knows? The photo makes them seem larger than they are.
|
|
|
#38584
05/10/2010 08:35 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 695
|
|
OP
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 695 |
Skyline! what a fantastic condition on that Sauer  many thanx for showing  Sam,
"Honesty is the best policy"
|
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,677
Posts329,285
Members7,539
| |
Most Online5,900
Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
|
