Interesting -but -there is NO proof of that. Just because the signature is etched-that makes it fake? That is pure garbage IMO. There is no basis for that idea. Talk about grasping for straws. What is this? There IS a period photo of this type dagger in wear. WHY is this being ignored? WHY do so many of you want these daggers to be fake?
If these were Atwood fakes--WHY bother with the extra signature at additional cost, when, at that time, IMO most collectors cared much less about NSKK stuff and would have much rather had the SA version anyway.
This, IMO, is getting quite absurd.
