|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,858
|
OP
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,858 |
I have a question on the second bayonet pictured below. The top bayonet is a standard TR Alcoso bayonet. The one below it is a Hugo K�ller bayonet. If you look at the top of the pommel you will notice it doesn't have the normal notch. I have noticed Weimar period bayonets with this same feature. Also the cross guard is thin compared to the normal TR bayonets. What do you think
TKissinger
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,136 Likes: 25
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,136 Likes: 25 |
Terry,
I've noticed the same lack of a notch on some Weimar era pieces as well. The rivet placement on the grip plates is unusual too.
GDC Gold Badge #290 GDC Silver Badge #310
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,155 Likes: 5
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,155 Likes: 5 |
Terry,
Here is another with the same treatment at the top of the pommel. This one is unmarked but has an angular cut pommel and a thin guard as well. Also, notice that it has screwbolts. I believe these to be Weimar period bayonets.
George
"You can't please everyone, so you've got to please yourself." Ricky Nelson
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,858
|
OP
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,858 |
Thanks Billy and George
George
I can't beleave that these thin crossguards survived all these years.
TKissinger
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,670
Posts329,305
Members7,546
|
Most Online5,900 Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
12 members (Ryanpyc57, Eric26, C. Wetzel-20609, Documentalist, BretVanSant, seany, Striwa78, ed773, Fitzer, Jonesy, Luftbud, Stephen),
259
guests, and
74
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|