|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 69
|
OP
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 69 |
here some pics for the interested parties.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 69
|
OP
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 69 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 69
|
OP
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 69 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 69
|
OP
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 69 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,627
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,627 |
Here is a correct RZM marking for a Youth Leader ...............
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,475
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,475 |
repro, the upper scabbard bands for one are immediate giveaway, there in the wrong direction,leather under the fittings look bad.RZM looks bad.....grip is flat,,,grip wrap color,crossguard to straight.pommel wrong, it just looks bad. Im sure there are many other tiny details to find on that dagger. Dont touch that one though.Tiep
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 228
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 228 |
I also agree with tiep. From the first view the red flags are: grip, rzm mark and lower fitting.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,475
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,475 |
I emailed the seller and he emails back,says sorry but its an original real dagger. If his dad had it 50 yrs , I told him he probably got the first fake ever made. Tiep ![Big Grin](http://daggers.infopop.net/infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif)
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,661
Posts329,332
Members7,566
|
Most Online5,900 Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
|