IMO it is a very nice mid period dagger, with nice propper accoutrement. Never mind that it is unmarked! It�s a quality piece with interesting features.
I cannot understand why "unmarked" daggers are such unpopular to a lot of collectors (just unexperienced ones???). They were manufactured that way during the period, sometimes manufacture-policy simply prohibited marking a dagger by some firms (think the period quarrel between Krebs, Himmler and other manufacturers concerning SSdegens) and they were manufactured in the same solid way like it�s brothers. So what�s the matter???
Both, 2nd mod RLB daggers I own (leader and enlisted) are unmarked and due to their condition I doubt I ever will give them away.
Regards,

wotan, gd.c-b#105

"Never look for sqare eggs" as a late owner of an original FHH-dagger used to say.