I posted this about another similar situation and thought it applied here as well . Recently I found a Post where another Collector said that it has turned into sortofa �Search & Destroy� game for us �whether it be an outright Fake , a Fantasy item ..or a period Item that�s been modified to increase its value �we enjoy the Hunt for the fakes and exposing them for what they are. After years , we�ve also developed an �Eye� which helps us identify weaknesses and anything that would tip us off that an item has problems �and there�s no way we could have done this without today�s Forums and the Information we share on them.
The Fakes and Repros have cost this Hobby a lot more than just Money.
The problem I�ve seen and one that Frustrates the Hell out of me�is that we�ve become so preoccupied pointing out the Flaws on everything , that sometimes we are losing focus and ..we�ve become too quick to mis-label an item as Fake rather than spend a little more time on it ..researching a little deeper, and sometimes finding out that in the end � we were wrong and it was real.
But with the quality of Repros out there ..I guess It�s easier and safer to question everything unless it�s an obvious text book example.
Without really having an item in hand and relying only on a few pictures ..it�s not always easy to know what we are looking at.
That�s why it�s great that we continue to share & discuss , that�s contributing to our Hobby. I�d love to see more Collectors post their opinion and actually back up what they saying �explain WHY they feel something is a repro or the points that ID it as real to them...We all hate the one liners, they only snowball and many times create problems and hard feelings that last (in some cases) for years. The way I look at it --we�re here to share, learn & educate ���..not to alienate.
I�m convinced there�s no such thing as an Expert in this Hobby ..but I know many Collectors are hesitant to voice their opinions because debates can get messy.
So ..here�s my 2 cents on the Caps ..attack at your leisure
![Big Grin](http://daggers.infopop.net/infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif)
Ken B �Yes , it looks new �and I agree with Ron about the Black Dachau Caps. But as Bob said, without holding it in your hand �I would find it hard to dismiss it by the pictures alone. I didn�t compare the insignia with known examples to see how it matches up ..but that could be a start.
As far as Harrison�s cap �the way the Eagle is sewn on worries me . The Eagle looks a little high and a little oversized to me (maybe from the extra fabric) ..speaking of which ,the extra fabric is not tucked under and then sewn the way the TK looks like it is. Also looks like 2 different style patches �the pic makes the TK look like flat wire and the Eagle looks like cloth thread (maybe I�m not seeing it correctly ?) Could the cap have come with just the TK and the Eagle was added later ? I wonder if there�s any evidence of stitching showing on the Liner behind the insignia?
The Statement Below is True<
The Statement Above is False<