UBB.threads
Posted By: juergen Vertical Skull Opinions? - 09/04/2009 07:43 PM
Hi

I would like to have your educated opinion on this one. I don't see any immediate red flags but i'm poor on these. The RZM-tag looks very new for a used tag. Better photos provided if needed.

Thanks in advance,

Br. Juergen

Attached picture vskull1.jpg
Posted By: juergen Re: Vertical Skull Opinions? - 09/04/2009 07:43 PM
2.

Attached picture vskull3.jpg
Posted By: juergen Re: Vertical Skull Opinions? - 09/04/2009 07:45 PM
3.

Attached picture vskull4.jpg
Posted By: juergen Re: Vertical Skull Opinions? - 09/04/2009 07:47 PM
4th and last for now

Attached picture vskull2.jpg
Posted By: militarymania Re: Vertical Skull Opinions? - 09/04/2009 08:05 PM
i dont like this one,,skull is misproportioned,,details to the cranium obscure,,i would pass on this one unless it was dog cheap..
Posted By: juergen Re: Vertical Skull Opinions? - 09/07/2009 05:04 PM
2 more for maybe second opinion.

Br. Juergen

Attached picture vskull5.jpg
Posted By: juergen Re: Vertical Skull Opinions? - 09/07/2009 05:05 PM
2.

Attached picture vskull6.jpg
Posted By: Doug Kenwright Re: Vertical Skull Opinions? - 09/07/2009 06:19 PM
Juergen, that 'wide' weave buckram stiffener is a huge red flag..
Posted By: juergen Re: Vertical Skull Opinions? - 09/07/2009 06:44 PM
Ok, I guess that nailed it. Maybe made in US in the 70s? My friend has had it maybe 20 years so it can't be a recent fake.

A big thanks for you!

Br. Juergen
Posted By: Bob Coleman Re: Vertical Skull Opinions? - 09/08/2009 03:57 AM
A poorly detailed skull. May I concur that the bukram is not consistant with that found on known original period examples.
Bob
Posted By: Robert H. Re: Vertical Skull Opinions? - 09/13/2009 05:07 PM
original ones show different weave pattern style
© Your new forums