UBB.threads
Posted By: reds ss grip question - 04/17/2006 09:03 PM
Any opinions on this grip? Definately original but I have alays wondered about the shape it doesn't seem cemetric at the bottom crossguard. shows signs of being taken apart on top crossguard(arghhh).want to list for sale but would like opinions before doing so maybey someone has seen this type of "flaw" if you will before?


Description: s2
Attached picture flex_116.jpg
Posted By: reds Re: ss grip question - 04/17/2006 09:04 PM
s3


Description: s3
Attached picture flex_101.jpg
Posted By: reds Re: ss grip question - 04/17/2006 09:07 PM
Sorry trying to make clear.


Description: s4
Attached picture flex_101.jpg
Posted By: Roger Jeandell aka Re: ss grip question - 04/17/2006 09:11 PM
Hello, Reds! Is the reverse the same as the obverse? Is it an RZM dagger? Regards, teufel
Posted By: Bernie Brule Re: ss grip question - 04/17/2006 09:37 PM
If that's the only "flaw", I wouldn't worry about it.
Posted By: reds Re: ss grip question - 04/17/2006 10:08 PM
This is a nonmarked blade. I would say the reverse is the same. I've never doubted originality was curious if anyone ever noticed this on any other grips?
Posted By: Roger Jeandell aka Re: ss grip question - 04/17/2006 10:31 PM
.
Posted By: Grumpy Re: ss grip question - 04/18/2006 02:07 AM
I wouldn't be concerned about it. It's possible one side has been repaired and that is the reason for the mismatch. But, I don't see any evidence of repair. It appears to be an "Eickhorn" grip assembly and that maker was a little "loose" with their grip fits and finishing. Could the blade be a ground Rohm?
Posted By: A J Re: ss grip question - 04/18/2006 06:54 PM
I have two early SAs that look exactly the same
© Your new forums