|
|
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 188 Likes: 2
|
OP
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 188 Likes: 2 |
Hello all , found 24 hours too late for this offer located at less than 100 km from home ! I am mad for this negligence , such an opportunity occurs only once a century :  please help ! I need the same ASAP ;-)) S+
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,666 Likes: 52
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,666 Likes: 52 |
The complete blade:
3.jpg (135.76 KB, 343 downloads)
You never have enough HJ-knifes!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,974 Likes: 33
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,974 Likes: 33 |
One of the tuffies to obtain cheer, Ryan
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,093 Likes: 99
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,093 Likes: 99 |
Are you certain that trademark is correct? I cannot quite see all the details, but I know that it has been faked on other daggers. Look where the lines start and stop:
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,666 Likes: 52
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,666 Likes: 52 |
That is an excellent point, Dave!
Yes, there are good copies, but on these the lines of the king are WITHOUT interruptions.
This one is the exact twin (makers mark & positioning, grip wood, grip eagle & other dagger parts...) of my ground Rohm, which I have for over a decade.
Best regards,
Herman
1.jpg (156.24 KB, 296 downloads)
You never have enough HJ-knifes!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 188 Likes: 2
|
|
OP
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 188 Likes: 2 |
Hello gents and thanks for your opinions ,
I am very disapointed by the comments having only been focused by forge's marks which were correct for this maker and the general
shape!
fakes are a formidable danger and a giant business .
then happy for having missed this "jewel" and thanks again to you .
S+
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 762 Likes: 1
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 762 Likes: 1 |
I can't see the details eighter but I think we souldn't dismiss this dagger too fast. All other parts are original for sure and the blade looks pretty convincing to me as well.
Danny
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 96
|
|
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 96 |
I see nothing incorrect in that trademark. What is exactly wrong? I've seen lots with non interrupted lines...
I'm very far from being an expert (light-years)... but still see nothing wrong with this piece.
Cheers!
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,666 Likes: 52
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,666 Likes: 52 |
Marc, Danny,
There is absolutely nothing wrong with this SA-dagger: it is an 100% textbook SMF Rohm.
The copies have non interrupted lines in the "seated king" logo, low quality blades & inscriptions and mounted in original (but non SMF!) dagger parts: all very easy to spot when you hold such a piece in your hand and even via pictures.
See hereunder the fake blade and logo.
Best regards,
Herman
Last edited by Herman V. (aka Herr Mann); 10/28/2017 01:16 PM.
You never have enough HJ-knifes!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 96
|
|
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 96 |
Thanks a lot for your explanations Herman. Really appreciate.
Best wishes,
Marc
|
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,667
Posts329,020
Members7,516
| |
Most Online5,900
Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
|
