|
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 9
|
OP
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 9 |
Really interested: 1) Which one is older? 2) How can you tell the general era of production early v. mid-war v. late? 3) Schooled me on what you see different (and the significance) between these two examples. 4) Is that nickel or silver? 5) are the scabs the same maker First examples is shown below... and second example is linked here... http://phpstack-500133-1583587.cloudwaysapps.com/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=327244&#Post327244
Last edited by Bob M; 03/16/2017 08:25 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 9
|
OP
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 9 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,020 Likes: 31
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,020 Likes: 31 |
Bob_M, personally I am not into the minute little differences concerning special classification. Naturally I do recognize them but for me the overall appearance of a dagger is in the first place. This said, due to the quality, the kind of silvering, the crossguard eagle und the special scabbard treats I would think that the dagger shown here is an earlier one and the dagger in the other thread is a later one. Both seem to be NOT nickle but a pot metal alloy. The photographs are not enough detailed for me in regard of certain regions, perhaps the crossguard of the one shown here might also be a brass alloy. BTW both are very nice daggers, the simulated ivory grip is special! Regards,
wotan, gd.c-b#105
"Never look for sqare eggs" as a late owner of an original FHH-dagger used to say.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 9
|
OP
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 9 |
Okay, I looked at the tang on this pumpkin colored WKC, and was surprise to see the early style tang. Is this pre- 1936/1937?
Also, the "rings" logo. Any significance? TIA
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,667
Posts329,021
Members7,517
|
Most Online5,900 Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
|