|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,344
|
OP
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,344 |
many thanks for all replies,,,Robert
Last edited by militarymania; 07/15/2016 01:51 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,814 Likes: 18
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,814 Likes: 18 |
I would like to see better shots of the grip plates, the pommel etch and the weird wide eagle.
So far, there is nothing that I like.
John
Always looking for Eickhorns and etched bayonets.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,020 Likes: 31
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,020 Likes: 31 |
The pommmel emblem does look like one of the typikal fake ones which are not done in the proper way.
Regards,
wotan, gd.c-b#105
"Never look for sqare eggs" as a late owner of an original FHH-dagger used to say.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,130 Likes: 24
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,130 Likes: 24 |
The pictures are not great but I don't like what I see so far, poor quality of that eagle & what's up with that mortise key?
GDC Gold Badge #290
GDC Silver Badge #310
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 31 Likes: 1
|
|
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 31 Likes: 1 |
Dear Robert, the obverse etch is nothing I have seen before in a Eickhorn etch. Plus the fact it is very lightly done. The pommel etch appears post war, although I haven't held enough to be an expert.
The rivets on the grip are way off and scream of being reworked. As Billy stated the mortise key is beaten up, not a good sign.
I would stay far away from this particular piece unless you want to be the last owner.
Best wishes,
Mat J
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 811 Likes: 1
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 811 Likes: 1 |
Robert,
Oh,come on guys, as all of you already know this one's a FAKE all the way. The inside eagle was NEVER an Eickhorn etch subject!
It ONLY belonged to Robert Klaas. So why bother with the balance of what the example is has or doesn't have on it. This is one of those pieces brought over in the late 50's
Von Ryan
|
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,671
Posts329,062
Members7,519
| |
Most Online5,900
Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
|
